word choice - provide vs. provide with - English Language Usage . . . The verb provide has two different subcategorisation frames: provide something [ to somebody] provide somebody with something In the first, the material provided is the object, in the second the recipient is the object Both are valid, and both are in common use The difference between them is the with phrase, which must be there to get meaning 2: if there is only one (direct) object, then
prepositions - Usage of the verb provide - English Language Usage . . . 16 Does the verb "provide" always have to be used with "with"? For example, Can you provide me with some good examples? Can you provide me some good examples? Can you provide some good examples? I suppose it's a transitive verb, isn't it? Moreover, is the following type of usage correct? You should provide food for your dog before you go on
prepositions - “provide X to someone” vs “provide X for someone . . . In other words, these are questions of coherent and natural-sounding phrasing, rather than strictly grammar, I believe "Provide for the common good" is an example of "provide" without an A and a B, by the way You can "provide for" something, or "provision" something, or "provide" something to someone
Preposition with verb provide - English Language Usage Stack Exchange For example, The umbrellas provide shade for the guests He provided drugs to the prisoners In both of these examples, one could have swapped to and for, although the sentences as written feel more natural Is there a good rule to use when deciding whether to use to or for with provide? No doubt endless opining on this question is possible
Insight Vs Insights - English Language Usage Stack Exchange I have an essay prompt that includes "insights" in the context "develop new insights into my community" This isn't actually correct for me to write in my essay is it? I mean insight can be used a