英文字典中文字典


英文字典中文字典51ZiDian.com



中文字典辞典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z       







请输入英文单字，中文词皆可：

intone    音标拼音: [ɪnt'on]
vt.
vi. 吟咏

吟咏

intone
v 1: utter monotonously and repetitively and rhythmically; "The
students chanted the same slogan over and over again" [synonym:
{tone}, {chant}, {intone}]
2: recite with musical intonation; recite as a chant or a psalm;
"The rabbi chanted a prayer" [synonym: {chant}, {intone},
{intonate}, {cantillate}]
3: speak carefully, as with rising and falling pitch or in a
particular tone; "please intonate with sadness" [synonym:
{intonate}, {intone}]

Intone \In*tone"\, v. t. [imp. & p. p. {Intoned}; p. pr. & vb.
n. {Intoning}.] [LL. intonare, intonatum; pref. in- in L.
tonus tone. See {Tone} and cf. {Entune}, {Intonate}.]
1. To utter with a musical or prolonged note or tone; to
chant; as, to intone the church service.
[1913 Webster]

2. To speak with a distinctive or unusual tone in the voice,
or in a monotone; as, the professor intoned his lectures
as though by rote.
[PJC]


Intone \In*tone"\, v. i.
To utter a prolonged tone or a deep, protracted sound; to
speak or recite in a measured, sonorous manner; to intonate.
--Pope.
[1913 Webster]


请选择你想看的字典辞典：
单词字典翻译
Intone查看　Intone　在百度字典中的解释百度英翻中〔查看〕
Intone查看　Intone　在Google字典中的解释Google英翻中〔查看〕
Intone查看　Intone　在Yahoo字典中的解释Yahoo英翻中〔查看〕

安装中文字典英文字典查询工具!


中文字典英文字典工具:
选择颜色:
输入中英文单字

































































英文字典中文字典相关资料:


  • Miranda v. Arizona | Constitution Center
    Miranda’s oral and written confessions are now held inadmissible under the Court’s new rules One is entitled to feel astonished that the Constitution can be read to produce this result
  • Miranda v. Arizona - Wikipedia
    Because of the defendant's low I Q and poor English-language skills, the U S Court of Appeals ruled that it was a "clear error" when the district court found that Garibay had "knowingly and intelligently waived his Miranda rights "
  • Miranda v. Arizona | Definition, Background, Facts | Britannica
    Arizona reversed an Arizona court’s conviction of Ernesto Miranda on charges of kidnapping and rape
  • Miranda v. Arizona: Case Summary, Ruling, and Legacy
    Miranda v Arizona, decided in 1966, is the Supreme Court case that created the warning police must give before questioning someone in custody The Court ruled 5–4 that the Fifth Amendment ‘s protection against self-incrimination requires officers to inform suspects of specific rights before any custodial interrogation begins Without those warnings, statements obtained during questioning
  • 1966: Miranda v. Arizona - A Latinx Resource Guide: Civil Rights Cases . . .
    In a 5-4 Supreme Court decision Miranda v Arizona (1966) ruled that an arrested individual is entitled to rights against self-incrimination and to an attorney under the 5th and 6th Amendments of the United States Constitution
  • Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (1966) - Justia U. S. Supreme Court Center
    On appeal, the Supreme Court of Arizona held that Miranda's constitutional rights were not violated in obtaining the confession, and affirmed the conviction 98 Ariz 18, 401 P 2d 721
  • Facts and Case Summary - Miranda v. Arizona - United States Courts
    In this case, the Supreme Court was asked to decide if the age of a juvenile being questioned by police should be taken into consideration when deciding if he or she is in police custody and, therefore, entitled to a Miranda warning
  • Miranda v. Arizona and Its Impact on Criminal Justice | LawHub
    All that changed with the 1966 U S Supreme Court decision Miranda v Arizona — a landmark case that fundamentally shaped American criminal procedure and significantly advanced civil rights At its core, the case centered around Ernesto Miranda, a man arrested in Phoenix, Arizona, for kidnapping and rape
  • Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Miranda v Arizona
    Miranda v Arizona was a case brought to the Supreme Court in 1966 after Ernesto Miranda appealed his guilty conviction of kidnapping and rape In his appeal, Miranda claimed he was unaware of his right to remain silent and his resulting confession should not be used to incriminate him
  • Miranda v. Arizona – Case Brief Summary - Studicata
    The final holding of the U S Supreme Court in Miranda v Arizona was that statements made during custodial interrogation are inadmissible unless the defendant is informed of their rights to remain silent and to counsel, and waives these rights knowingly and intelligently





中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009